<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sick of Social Media Political Spam? Just wait. It&#8217;s Going to Get Worse.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialnewswatch.com/social-media-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialnewswatch.com/social-media-politics/</link>
	<description>Keeping a close watch over social media since 1874.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 10:06:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD Rucker</title>
		<link>http://socialnewswatch.com/social-media-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>JD Rucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialnewswatch.com/social-media-politics/#comment-332</guid>
		<description>The social media traffic - probably not much.  In reality, social media users are, for the most part, very opinionated.  The press that one person or another receives doesn&#039;t sway their votes.

The effect will come in that social media effects Google, and whne people (non-social media types) start looking into &quot;who is Barack Obama&quot;: or &quot;what does Romney believe&quot;, they are going to go to the search engines.  Controlling what pops us is extremely important, so social media will get its share of importance even though it won&#039;t be in direct influence of opinions.  The influence on Google is social media&#039;s real political strength.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The social media traffic &#8211; probably not much.  In reality, social media users are, for the most part, very opinionated.  The press that one person or another receives doesn&#8217;t sway their votes.</p>
<p>The effect will come in that social media effects Google, and whne people (non-social media types) start looking into &#8220;who is Barack Obama&#8221;: or &#8220;what does Romney believe&#8221;, they are going to go to the search engines.  Controlling what pops us is extremely important, so social media will get its share of importance even though it won&#8217;t be in direct influence of opinions.  The influence on Google is social media&#8217;s real political strength.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Poniatowski</title>
		<link>http://socialnewswatch.com/social-media-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Poniatowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialnewswatch.com/social-media-politics/#comment-331</guid>
		<description>The question is, does this social network traffic and enhanced Google coverage result in more votes?  As you point out, R. Paul gets a lot of social media attention, yet he&#039;s far behind the front runners in the republican race.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is, does this social network traffic and enhanced Google coverage result in more votes?  As you point out, R. Paul gets a lot of social media attention, yet he&#8217;s far behind the front runners in the republican race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/13 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 210/279 objects using disk: basic

Served from: socialnewswatch.com @ 2012-05-21 08:44:07 -->
