<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media Outcry Brings Competition to the Table</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialnewswatch.com/new-social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialnewswatch.com/new-social-media/</link>
	<description>Keeping a close watch over social media since 1874.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 01:43:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recent Links Tagged With "socialnews" - JabberTags</title>
		<link>http://socialnewswatch.com/new-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-15288</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent Links Tagged With "socialnews" - JabberTags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 01:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialnewswatch.com/new-social-media/#comment-15288</guid>
		<description>[...] is Dropping the Ball (limited to 3 issues, begrudgingly) Saved by natasharbd on Tue 16-12-2008   Social Media Outcry Brings Competition to the Table Saved by spottedMetal on Thu 11-12-2008   6 Things That Work Right Now on Reddit &quot; 10e20 - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is Dropping the Ball (limited to 3 issues, begrudgingly) Saved by natasharbd on Tue 16-12-2008   Social Media Outcry Brings Competition to the Table Saved by spottedMetal on Thu 11-12-2008   6 Things That Work Right Now on Reddit &quot; 10e20 &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yong</title>
		<link>http://socialnewswatch.com/new-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-3198</link>
		<dc:creator>Yong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 05:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialnewswatch.com/new-social-media/#comment-3198</guid>
		<description>whoops, I didn&#039;t know that my last comment was so long. I would have emailed you instead had I found your email address. I would totally understand if you deleted it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whoops, I didn&#8217;t know that my last comment was so long. I would have emailed you instead had I found your email address. I would totally understand if you deleted it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yong</title>
		<link>http://socialnewswatch.com/new-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-3197</link>
		<dc:creator>Yong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 04:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialnewswatch.com/new-social-media/#comment-3197</guid>
		<description>Hi, I would like to pitch you my social news website, fyynd.com. I wrote this website in two months based on algorithms from the book Programming Collective Intelligence. Please tell me what you think.

It has two main features: the ability to identify related/similar links and suggestions/recommendations that actually work.

The basis for all of the algorithms is a document similarity metric presented in Chapter 3: Discovering Groups. Basically, to compare document A with document B, we calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient between the word frequencies of document A and the word counts of document B. (You can imagine this as plotting a series of points of a graph: each point&#039;s x coordinate is its frequency in document A and each point&#039;s Y coordinate is its frequency in document B. The Pearson correlation coefficient is a measure of how well the line-of-best-fit fits the points.)

Using this similarity metric, links can be clustered together using K-means clustering. This is what you get when you click on &quot;related&quot; at the bottom of each link. Clicking on &quot;similar&quot; gives the results of running K-NN. (&quot;related&quot; doesn&#039;t work as well as it could be right now because there are too few links for a link to be similar with, but this is an example of where it does work: http://fyynd.com/links/197/related/ &quot;similar&quot; usually works better right now.)

There are two algorithms for giving recommendations, &quot;Suggested&quot; and &quot;Recommended&quot;. &quot;Recommended&quot; generally works better than Suggested when you haven&#039;t yet made many votes but Suggested should be more in tune to your preferences in the long run.

In layman&#039;s terms, the Recommendation algorithm works by &quot;averaging&quot; together the links that you liked and then find links that are similar to that while the Suggestion algorithm tries to determine whether you will like a particular link by seeing whether it is similar to any page that you have already rated highly. As a result, &quot;Recommended&quot; will list pages in your general interest area, but insensitive to any &quot;niche&quot; interest that you might have. The &quot;Suggested&quot; page will be sensitive to &quot;niche&quot; interests but will requires more votes to train. For example, if most of the link you rate highly are about computer science, with a only a few links about biology, when the recommendation algorithm averages them together, the biology links would count for very little. As a result, you wouldn&#039;t see much on biology. On the other hand, the suggestion algorithm will not be hindered by this, though it will have trouble if you don&#039;t vote much.

By now, I hope to have convinced you that I know what I am doing and that my algorithms do work!

Please note that because predictions are so computationally intensive, they are not updated in real-time but on a hourly basis. Thus, you have to wait a bit before they come out. Please be patient!

Please check it out and tell me what you think! Any questions/comments/suggestions are more than welcome! You can email me at comments@fyynd.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I would like to pitch you my social news website, fyynd.com. I wrote this website in two months based on algorithms from the book Programming Collective Intelligence. Please tell me what you think.</p>
<p>It has two main features: the ability to identify related/similar links and suggestions/recommendations that actually work.</p>
<p>The basis for all of the algorithms is a document similarity metric presented in Chapter 3: Discovering Groups. Basically, to compare document A with document B, we calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient between the word frequencies of document A and the word counts of document B. (You can imagine this as plotting a series of points of a graph: each point&#8217;s x coordinate is its frequency in document A and each point&#8217;s Y coordinate is its frequency in document B. The Pearson correlation coefficient is a measure of how well the line-of-best-fit fits the points.)</p>
<p>Using this similarity metric, links can be clustered together using K-means clustering. This is what you get when you click on &#8220;related&#8221; at the bottom of each link. Clicking on &#8220;similar&#8221; gives the results of running K-NN. (&#8220;related&#8221; doesn&#8217;t work as well as it could be right now because there are too few links for a link to be similar with, but this is an example of where it does work: <a href="http://fyynd.com/links/197/related/" rel="nofollow">http://fyynd.com/links/197/related/</a> &#8220;similar&#8221; usually works better right now.)</p>
<p>There are two algorithms for giving recommendations, &#8220;Suggested&#8221; and &#8220;Recommended&#8221;. &#8220;Recommended&#8221; generally works better than Suggested when you haven&#8217;t yet made many votes but Suggested should be more in tune to your preferences in the long run.</p>
<p>In layman&#8217;s terms, the Recommendation algorithm works by &#8220;averaging&#8221; together the links that you liked and then find links that are similar to that while the Suggestion algorithm tries to determine whether you will like a particular link by seeing whether it is similar to any page that you have already rated highly. As a result, &#8220;Recommended&#8221; will list pages in your general interest area, but insensitive to any &#8220;niche&#8221; interest that you might have. The &#8220;Suggested&#8221; page will be sensitive to &#8220;niche&#8221; interests but will requires more votes to train. For example, if most of the link you rate highly are about computer science, with a only a few links about biology, when the recommendation algorithm averages them together, the biology links would count for very little. As a result, you wouldn&#8217;t see much on biology. On the other hand, the suggestion algorithm will not be hindered by this, though it will have trouble if you don&#8217;t vote much.</p>
<p>By now, I hope to have convinced you that I know what I am doing and that my algorithms do work!</p>
<p>Please note that because predictions are so computationally intensive, they are not updated in real-time but on a hourly basis. Thus, you have to wait a bit before they come out. Please be patient!</p>
<p>Please check it out and tell me what you think! Any questions/comments/suggestions are more than welcome! You can email me at <a href="mailto:comments@fyynd.com">comments@fyynd.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://socialnewswatch.com/new-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1814</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialnewswatch.com/new-social-media/#comment-1814</guid>
		<description>No rotten tomatoes - I&#039;m very disillusioned with social media as it exists today and would love to see something that couldn&#039;t be gamed and really would present superior content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No rotten tomatoes &#8211; I&#8217;m very disillusioned with social media as it exists today and would love to see something that couldn&#8217;t be gamed and really would present superior content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 4/15 queries in 0.018 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 240/309 objects using disk: basic

Served from: socialnewswatch.com @ 2012-05-16 21:46:47 -->
