<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Spam Killed Digg, Reddit, and StumbleUpon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialnewswatch.com/how-spam-killed-digg-reddit-and-stumbleupon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialnewswatch.com/how-spam-killed-digg-reddit-and-stumbleupon/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:11:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pipen</title>
		<link>http://socialnewswatch.com/how-spam-killed-digg-reddit-and-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-64414</link>
		<dc:creator>Pipen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 12:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialnewswatch.com/?p=241#comment-64414</guid>
		<description>While DIGG and StumbleUpon seem to kill all the submissions from new users/new domains, not allowing any promotion for such sites, reddit seems to give us a chance.

I have sucessfully attracted thousands of visitors from reddit to several pages during the launch by serving quality content (which got highly uppvoted too, so it wasnt&#039;t spam after all). I would highly recommend becoming a real reddit user, and only then attempting to promote your site there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While DIGG and StumbleUpon seem to kill all the submissions from new users/new domains, not allowing any promotion for such sites, reddit seems to give us a chance.</p>
<p>I have sucessfully attracted thousands of visitors from reddit to several pages during the launch by serving quality content (which got highly uppvoted too, so it wasnt&#8217;t spam after all). I would highly recommend becoming a real reddit user, and only then attempting to promote your site there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peace</title>
		<link>http://socialnewswatch.com/how-spam-killed-digg-reddit-and-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-43980</link>
		<dc:creator>Peace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialnewswatch.com/?p=241#comment-43980</guid>
		<description>The basic cause of spamming is advertising by different companies and especially those who do not want to spend money for this purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The basic cause of spamming is advertising by different companies and especially those who do not want to spend money for this purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doe</title>
		<link>http://socialnewswatch.com/how-spam-killed-digg-reddit-and-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-42119</link>
		<dc:creator>doe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 01:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialnewswatch.com/?p=241#comment-42119</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Kurt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Kurt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rimgaz</title>
		<link>http://socialnewswatch.com/how-spam-killed-digg-reddit-and-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-41905</link>
		<dc:creator>rimgaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialnewswatch.com/?p=241#comment-41905</guid>
		<description>thx i think spamming these
social networks will destroy quality</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thx i think spamming these<br />
social networks will destroy quality</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strandh.DigitalPR &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DigitalPR omvärldsanalyserar [2010/04/11]</title>
		<link>http://socialnewswatch.com/how-spam-killed-digg-reddit-and-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-37631</link>
		<dc:creator>Strandh.DigitalPR &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DigitalPR omvärldsanalyserar [2010/04/11]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 09:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialnewswatch.com/?p=241#comment-37631</guid>
		<description>[...] How Spam Killed Digg, Reddit, and StumbleUpon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How Spam Killed Digg, Reddit, and StumbleUpon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Spam Killed Digg, Reddit, and StumbleUpon &#124; Agent Zoo</title>
		<link>http://socialnewswatch.com/how-spam-killed-digg-reddit-and-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-35458</link>
		<dc:creator>How Spam Killed Digg, Reddit, and StumbleUpon &#124; Agent Zoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialnewswatch.com/?p=241#comment-35458</guid>
		<description>[...] Digg, Reddit, and StumbleUpon to be so changed by the presence of [...]View full post on Social News Watch  Tags: Digg, Killed, Reddit, Spam, Stumbleupon Posted under: social media Comment (RSS) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digg, Reddit, and StumbleUpon to be so changed by the presence of [...]View full post on Social News Watch  Tags: Digg, Killed, Reddit, Spam, Stumbleupon Posted under: social media Comment (RSS) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://socialnewswatch.com/how-spam-killed-digg-reddit-and-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-34977</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialnewswatch.com/?p=241#comment-34977</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the same for me with Stumbleupon.  What I consider to be a decent post receives no attention at all, whereas I have a handful of pages that for some reason get picked up and I get thousands of page views a day.  They then lose all their traffic, until one day BOOM thousands more page views.  While the traffic is nice to have though, those visitors barely spend any time on my site and soon leave, so no clicks or browsing through more pages, which is disappointing.  After 2 or more years I still fail to understand Stumbleupon, however I have come across some good people and some good sites through it.

Digg I never did get anywhere with.  I agree that it&#039;s an elitist site, and rarely submit there any more.   Delicious I don&#039;t think I have ever got any traffic from at all.

Tagfoot is proving to be a really good site for traffic, and so far it is practically spam free.  A set of moderators constantly check the site for spam sites and accounts, and flush them away, so I highly recommend trying this site if you are looking for somewhere different to promote your sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the same for me with Stumbleupon.  What I consider to be a decent post receives no attention at all, whereas I have a handful of pages that for some reason get picked up and I get thousands of page views a day.  They then lose all their traffic, until one day BOOM thousands more page views.  While the traffic is nice to have though, those visitors barely spend any time on my site and soon leave, so no clicks or browsing through more pages, which is disappointing.  After 2 or more years I still fail to understand Stumbleupon, however I have come across some good people and some good sites through it.</p>
<p>Digg I never did get anywhere with.  I agree that it&#8217;s an elitist site, and rarely submit there any more.   Delicious I don&#8217;t think I have ever got any traffic from at all.</p>
<p>Tagfoot is proving to be a really good site for traffic, and so far it is practically spam free.  A set of moderators constantly check the site for spam sites and accounts, and flush them away, so I highly recommend trying this site if you are looking for somewhere different to promote your sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Spam Killed Digg, Reddit, and StumbleUpon &#171; LMD308 Collaborative Environments</title>
		<link>http://socialnewswatch.com/how-spam-killed-digg-reddit-and-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-34927</link>
		<dc:creator>How Spam Killed Digg, Reddit, and StumbleUpon &#171; LMD308 Collaborative Environments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialnewswatch.com/?p=241#comment-34927</guid>
		<description>[...] more&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Wheeler</title>
		<link>http://socialnewswatch.com/how-spam-killed-digg-reddit-and-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-34671</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Wheeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialnewswatch.com/?p=241#comment-34671</guid>
		<description>I agree with Kurt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Kurt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://socialnewswatch.com/how-spam-killed-digg-reddit-and-stumbleupon/comment-page-1/#comment-34559</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialnewswatch.com/?p=241#comment-34559</guid>
		<description>@Felipe
Privacy is worth more than Digg or Reddit.

StumbleUpon&#039;s biggest mistake was moving from a toolbar to framejacking (HTML frames with su.pr). There will be a webmaster backlash against framejacking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Felipe<br />
Privacy is worth more than Digg or Reddit.</p>
<p>StumbleUpon&#8217;s biggest mistake was moving from a toolbar to framejacking (HTML frames with su.pr). There will be a webmaster backlash against framejacking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/16 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 389/393 objects using disk: basic

Served from: socialnewswatch.com @ 2012-02-08 01:53:04 -->
